<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft places bid on Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anders.tyckr.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-places-bid-on-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anders.tyckr.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-places-bid-on-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Words of a startup CEO</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Sjölander</title>
		<link>http://anders.tyckr.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-places-bid-on-yahoo/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sjölander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anders.tyckr.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-places-bid-on-yahoo/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I think it was inevitable. The timing was just perfect. M$ has talked about being committed to search and internet advertising as their #1 priority for a couple of years. Yahoo! has a dip, and I guess that's what sealed the deal.

I agree on your obsevations. And it's not only about prefering to be open. It's the one way to go. If M$ becomes the closed Internet company they will loose the game. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was inevitable. The timing was just perfect. M$ has talked about being committed to search and internet advertising as their #1 priority for a couple of years. Yahoo! has a dip, and I guess that&#8217;s what sealed the deal.</p>
<p>I agree on your obsevations. And it&#8217;s not only about prefering to be open. It&#8217;s the one way to go. If M$ becomes the closed Internet company they will loose the game. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
